You May Also Like

#OurVoteCounts: Why we need to make our voices heard

10 mind-blowing things I learned at the Bulletproof Biohacking Conference

The one thing you might be forgetting about that could help you fulfill your life’s purpose

My wellness hangover: How “empowering” memes bummed me out

Why Gwyneth Paltrow’s on board with the #nomakeup movement

Yes, even the healthiest women get breast cancer

Reebok’s toning shoe claims are bogus, says FTC

Reebok easytone refundIf you purchased Reebok’s EasyTone or RunTone shoes but never got those perfectly-toned thighs you were promised, you may be eligible for a refund.

The Federal Trade Commission announced today that Reebok will be paying $25 million to the many consumers who purchased its toning shoes because of unsupported advertising claims made by the company.

“The FTC wants national advertisers to understand that they must exercise some responsibility and ensure that their claims for fitness gear are supported by sound science,” said David Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a press release posted to the FTC’s website.


But what about the rest of those sneaker companies who try to convince us that wearing hideous, clunky kicks will make our butts perkier?

According to the FTC, Reebok was just too specific, citing exact percentages its shoes could increase strength and toning. They would have been better off sticking to Skechers’ style of vague pronouncements like “promote weight loss” and “tone muscles.”

We’re just glad the FTC is finally paying attention to these egregious get-fit-without-a-gym claims. Maybe now they’ll take a look a similarly implausible product: toning clothing.
Lisa Elaine Held