You May Also Like

Squash blossom pizza is the summery recipe your taste buds have been waiting for

The 7 Malala quotes to get you through any (emotional) emergency

Here’s the easy way to feel a lot younger than your age

Paging Dr. Google: How an app may soon diagnose your symptoms

Are midnight snacks making your sunburns worse?

The one smoothie mistake that’s making you bloated

Good news: Study says almonds have less calories than we thought

By Briana Rognlin for

Almonds are a perennial favorite on healthy snack lists, but when you’re watching portion size carefully, a single serving can be depressingly small. And although we could munch the damn things all day long, most of us fear that we’re doing ourselves harm with the calorie- and fat-dense food.

But a new study says we can be at least a little less concerned; apparently, almonds have less calories than we thought.

The study authors set out to determine whether the traditional measure of calories–called “Atwater factors”–might be inaccurate for certain food groups. To do so, they measured the “metabolizable energy content” of almonds by analyzing fecal matter, urine, and blood samples of study subjects who ate consistent, specifically set amounts of almonds.

Their findings show that 30 almonds contain 165 calories, where Atwater factors said that only 23 almonds contain 165 calories.

Keep reading…

More reading from

Derek Flanzraich got six-pack abs in six weeks (and it sucked)
It’s ok to admire Olympic athletes, just don’t aspire to look like them