You May Also Like

Cleaning hacks for home using newspaper for dust

Never dust your home’s hard-to-reach nooks and crannies again, thanks to this simple hack

Well+Good - 6 warning signs you're getting a sunburn

6 warning signs you’re getting a sunburn

Why is trust important in a relationship

Want your relationship to succeed? Experts say this one element is crucial

The best temperature for an office for best work

Brain fog making it hard to work? Blame the heat wave—seriously

Easy methods for lime disease prevention

Handle your citrus with care: Lime disease (not Lyme disease) causes *major* skin inflammation

Vegan sour cream alternative uses coconut yogurt

Make a creamy vegan sour cream alternative in seconds, no blender needed

There might be a scientific reason your S.O. lacks the romance gene


Thumbnail for There might be a scientific reason your S.O. lacks the romance gene
Pin It
Photo: Stocksy/GIC Images

The past couple of years have seen a new (somewhat social-media driven) era of honesty when it comes to sex, mental health, and relationships. The social constructs surrounding the gender binary and sexuality are being rethought and reconceptualized, while monogamy as the only acceptable relationship option is being similarly called into question. A new study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior used fMRI machines to examine the difference in male responses to romantic and sexual images, based on whether they identified as monogamous or non-monogamous—and the results might throw a wrench in your hot Valentine’s Day dream plans

According to the study authors, romantic photos were more stimulating and enticing for those who identify as monogamous.

For the study, 20 men—10 who identified as monogamous and 10 who did not—underwent brain scans while viewing a series of romantic and sexual photos. According to the study authors, the “results indicated that monogamous men showed more reward-related neural activity when viewing romantic pictures compared to non-monogamous men,” which means romantic photos were more stimulating and enticing for the guys who identify as monogamous.

But, what’s the takeaway? Once a cheater always a cheater? That men see romance as mentally rewarding only when they’re paired up? Essentially, it’s hard to tell; for starters, 20 men is an extremely small sample. Second, the definition for a lack of monogamy isn’t expressly defined here—does it refer to polyamory, open relationships, or explicitly cheating? Because, I don’t know about you, but IMO, those situations are not identical.

Though so many details remain unclear, at least we know, scientifically speaking, romance isn’t totally dead.

Other recent discoveries from the world of science show that sleeping enough could be the key to cutting sugar cravings and that women are historically more resilient than men during times of crisis.

Loading More Posts...

You May Also Like

How Hannah Simone, 'New Girl', actor multitasks

3 multitasking healthy habits that streamline Hannah Simone’s busy days

Why is trust important in a relationship

Want your relationship to succeed? Experts say this one element is crucial

crop lip gloss

Why your lip gloss actually *shouldn’t* be clear

Well+Good - 6 warning signs you're getting a sunburn

6 warning signs you’re getting a sunburn

Well+Good - Kate Middleton's favorite sneakers cost less than a pair of leggings

Kate Middleton’s favorite sneakers cost less than a pair of leggings

New Balance Celine Cortes

Borrow this Well+Good team member’s go-to formula for max summer relaxation